Old Pythagoras remembers ... he was already playing with right-angled triangles and squares at the age of ten. Oh, he could have discovered the mathematical theorem, which was later named after him even then ... he was so close ...

I love this series. Greetings from the mathematician! 😉

SkyRain, I came over to see your portfolio after reading your comments at LouisCat @Lynncat. Glad I did, I really enjoy your work.

This creation is of particular interest to me because of the triangles on the desk...

It's a really good scene even though not what you wanted SkyRain. You could try making the "10 years old" statement the priority, first sentence... and this bit "560 years before Christ was born" fit in later.

So I tried it myself and while the Number 560 is in the prompt I got an old man. I removed that sentence altogether and started with ""Pythagoras, now 10 years of age discovers his famous theorem about right-angled triangles He is standing alone at a big table in an old wooden house, moving large triangles and squares cut out of coloured paper, forming the geometric form of his theorem with the papers, morning sun light shining on the table"" ...... and I got a 10 yr old boy.

I do hope that helps a little. 🙂🌼

Did the young Pythagoras really play with geometric shapes he cut out of paper and used it to discover (and prove) his famous theorem?

Surely not. Because Wiki says: "The use of papyrus in Greece has been proven by finds since the second half of the 5th century BC at the latest." And Pythagoras lived from 570 to 510 BC.

So much for historical accuracy ...

But today we can play with right-angled triangles and squares … trying to prove the theorem … and little Saidu succeeded! (see other picture) 💎

Dear SkyRain, thank you for the credits, a very kind gift indeed. Haven't you already given me credits for those comments which I made some time ago? You must keep those credits for your work my friend 😀 🪷 🪷

Hmmm, interesting image, my answers as to the errors would most likely be incorrect!

Well, there is something funny about Juggernaut's implementation of this idea - you can see at least two errors in the picture. But after 50 attempts I didn't want to start all over again ...