NightCafe Logo
Create
Anonymous User

Runway Gen-3 Alpha Turbo

Video· ·120K+ creations·15 comments
Unfortunately, Runway Gen-3 Alpha Turbo is a legacy video model that has been sunset and is no longer available on NightCafe. We recommend trying one of the newer models instead. Read more
An image-to-video model by Runway.

Runway Gen-3 Alpha Turbo, developed by Runway AI, is a high-speed image-to-video model launched in July 2024, built on the Gen-3 Alpha architecture. Trained on a multimodal dataset, it generates dynamic videos with improved fidelity, motion consistency, and natural animations, optimized for affordability.

On NightCafe, Gen-3 Alpha Turbo transforms static images into short videos (up to 10 seconds) with lifelike movements, supporting styles like cinematic, cartoon, or photorealistic. Features like Act-One and camera controls enhance character performances and scene transitions, though it requires an input image.

Perfect for filmmakers, marketers, and artists, this model enables NightCafe users to create engaging, production-ready videos efficiently, rivaling top AI video tools.


Recent creations by the community

See what people have made with this model

0
2
0
2
https://creator.nightcafe.studio/collection/hEE964ZEUXa6tqUuWdNv https://creator.nightcafe.studio/collection/QVu76jXF6zg47eBxqtC7
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
5
1
Madeucea

Frequently asked questions

What is Runway Gen-3 Alpha Turbo?

Gen-3 Alpha Turbo is Runway’s fast image-to-video AI model on NightCafe, generating realistic, high-quality videos from static images.

What types of videos can Gen-3 Alpha Turbo create?

It produces short videos (up to 10 seconds) in cinematic, cartoon, or photorealistic styles with natural motion and detailed animations.

How does Gen-3 Alpha Turbo differ from Gen-3 Alpha?

It’s faster and more cost-effective, matching quality for many use cases but requires an input image, unlike Gen-3 Alpha’s text-to-video option.

Is Gen-3 Alpha Turbo suitable for professionals?

Yes, its speed and camera controls make it ideal for professional filmmaking, marketing, and creative projects.

What are Gen-3 Alpha Turbo’s limitations?

It doesn’t support text-to-video, and complex prompts may need high-quality input images for optimal results.


Comments

Anonymous User
Sort: Most recent
PRO

it defiantly needs a preview I have yet to have this follow my prompts! or some tips of exactly what to say I wasted 30 credit on my owl image prompt make it's head move eyes blink and wings flap the image is just a slight bounce of the entire image nothing inside moving what's wrong with it

2025-02-22T00:50:57.600ZReply

Also, it can only do 16:9 or 9:16 and... that's annoying

Okay, Runway is really good! Way better than Luma. But it's also expensive, 30-60 credits and if you don't like the results - too bad. It really is a risk and honestly I wouldn't recommend using this unless you have a lot of credits or have a very simple foolproof video idea.

I can now see only 2 rows of creations with this model here. What happened? Before we could access a long list of images

Despite repeat unacceptable animation results, I still use this model. When it works, it can give lovely outcomes but recently it has been glitchy. However, I am still glad that we have this option. Maybe we can have a time limited discount offer or some other option that will incentivize more people to use while making it more affordable.

I continue to use this model and find that it is simply fabulous. I am so glad we have it available. I still have a lot to learn to use it better, but most results are really pretty and impressive. Well done, NightCafe.

A nice video option, but it costs a lot of credits. What about a preview option of the video and charging the credits only if you accept the results?

View replies (4)

I have been able to get some very good results with this model. Actually better ones than with the Luma model, which costs 10 credits more. Runway adds a lot more independent motion to the video than Luma, which results in surprising animations. I go back and forth between the two, but of course the price prohibits constant use. SO far, I am rather happy with capabilities of this model.

IDK I tried it and not getting any good results with 30 credit option, IDK about paying 60 credits for the better options. This is rather expensive in general for something that might be good 1 out of 10 times. No one ever puts real info in these comments but i will. if you pay for the 10 dollars pro plan you can only make 6 of these creations with all your monthly credits and have 20 credits to make a creation to turn to video, the stable video is not much worse and only 5 credits.