Boycott the "Raccoon" Daily Challenge

this is so true , my image from the lover challenge was 4.02 three hours before the challenge ends , it ended with 3.7

Yeah

There has been something strange about the daily challenge for some time now. I have seen these things happen (and they have happened to me at least three or four times) whenever I was close to occupying the podium with votes. It didn't happen to me when I was "hush and quiet" around the 20th position....

Something stinks here. The Daily Challenge has become more and more important, so much so that it is now The Most Important Thing at NightCafé (go to Explore and look at the top-rated images of the last month) -- and the staff is incentivizing this behavior by various "groups" instead of putting an end to it?

You guys think what you want. I will never participate in a challenge from this point forward. I will post pictures in the gallery, but I will not have them participate in the challenge, because it no longer makes sense to do so. Not after the staff email.

Once is a coincidence, twice is suspect, thrice is annoying, four times is on purpose.

Then, just yesterday, something happens that makes me think a lot. Support, what? I felt so stupid... I receive an email -- as I think many of you have received -- from the higher ups on the NightCafe staff where the wonderful news of chatrooms is advertised and, one of the reasons chatrooms should be encouraged. is (and I quote):

"DOMINATE THE DAILY CHALLENGES" "First you get the votes, then you get the credits, then you get the glory."

And again, right underneath: "Gather the crew. Critique, cajole [...] until you've claimed the daily challenge and conquered all the credits as your own."

[continued in next comment].

Here is the explanation of my boycott. Yesterday, two hours before closing, my image (linked above) was at 4.12 -- that is, in one of the top 3/5 positions. Then, as magically happens always (which is why so many times we contacted support) -- in the last two hours it was donwvoted fiercely. It ended up at 3.69 -- since I know about numbers, that means at least 100 or 200 people systematically voted her 1 or 2. This is what I and others have been saying for a long time: there are "groups" that support each other.

Come on, hasn't this ever happened to you? That suddenly and in the last 120 minutes or so, your entry would inexplicably lose ground? And what about the frankly unwatchable images we often find in the very first positions (not on the podium, but immediately below)?

[continued in next comment].